Show More. Recycling reduces the volume of waste materials on landfill thus limiting the prevalence of health problem. Although, some individuals think that recycling can be too expensive to continue to participate in because of initial setup costs Ecologistand could put people at risk of dangerous toxication by reusing trash or products that may have left over dirt and could be unsanitary Ecologist. Yet there is no environmental reason to recycle trash because resources are not scarce. While recycling remains an option for most Americans, should recycling be mandatory essay, a few cities, such as Pittsburgh, San Diego and Seattle, have made recycling mandatory.
Essays Related To Recycling should be Mandatory for Everyone
All around the world countless numbers of people like the thought of recycling, but most individuals never choose to recycle. Recycling is a process in which you take materials that you would normally throw away and reuse them to form new products Rinkesh, should recycling be mandatory essay. University students around the world studied that environmental awareness has to do with how much we choose to recycle Ramayah, should recycling be mandatory essay. For the people who do choose to recycle trash or other recyclable goods usually do it to reduce the amount of pollution that enters the air which can be a leading factor for climate change.
Two other reasons as to why recyclists are in favor of reusing trash is because it can conserve some resources that can help should recycling be mandatory essay our natural habitats by lowering greenhouse emissions produced by harmful waste Superadmin and recycling can also save energy by reducing the amount of sources we make while we can just reuse the sources Superadmin. Although, some individuals think that recycling can be too expensive to continue to participate in because of initial setup costs Ecologistand could put people at risk of dangerous toxication should recycling be mandatory essay reusing trash or products that may have left over dirt and could be unsanitary Ecologist.
One other problem individuals have with converting waste is that it does not have a long lasting effect because of how much materials we use today and people think that it is a waste of time, money, and effort Ecologist, should recycling be mandatory essay. Overall, recycling can be a great thing for the environment but is it great for us? This leads to many of us asking the question if the pros of recycling outweigh the cons, so should we make it mandatory for people around the world to take part in? How it works. The first perspective of this argument is that we should make it mandatory for people around the world, but why? This is because by recycling you reduce the amount of pollution that enters the air, which can lead to less greenhouse emissions Green Guardian.
Landfills also have a major impact on the amount of pollution there is, should recycling be mandatory essay, by reusing products it can lessen the space taken by waste to reduce pollution that landfill waste gives off to the environment Rinkesh. Pizza Hut is also taking a part in reducing waste by using round pizza boxes. Using these should recycling be mandatory essay are proven to make less waste because of its round shape with less room, and the box is made up of plant fibers so it can be organically composted Washington Post.
The other reason why many people believe that recycling should be mandatory is because of its ability to save our natural habitats. Since not recycling can cause climate change, climate change can lead to lower amounts of dissolved oxygen which can danger many of the wildlife habitats Rogers. One example of trash affecting wildlife is the world wide problem of plastic in our oceans. Not only is plastic harmful for the environment, electronics have the same dangerous outcomes just as regular trash. Electronics can contain metals and hazardous chemicals which can get into the ground or water and make an environment more dangerous for wildlife. A geological survey states that nearly two-thirds of Americans get their water from freshwater sources which can be contaminated from electronics which is harmful Rogers, should recycling be mandatory essay.
Just by recycling our trash can help decrease the chances of a habitat being destroyed because we can keep the waste away from the animals. Lastly, recycling can be a great way to save energy. When you make new resources it can consume a lot of energy, by recycling it can decrease the amount of energy you use because you are making less products by reusing them Geosciences. On the other hand, there is always a con to the pros. Many people believe recycling should be mandatory around the world but there are always individuals that disagree. This Many argue that the three-hundred dollars spent to send aways recycled objects could be spent on something other than recycling Tsang. Another reason to this side of the perspective is that there can be toxic substances left over from uses before.
All of the recycled products came from somewhere and that could have been somewhere unsanitary which increases the risk of individuals getting sick Ecologists Recycled objects that include chemical exposure can also be powerful to the equipment that is being used to move waste from place to place or where it is being held Leadpoint. Problems can also occur while recycling, like throwing something away in a recycling bin that is not actually meant to should recycling be mandatory essay recycled and can cause dangerous troubles in composting process Westervelt. The third reason for why people think that composting and reusing products should not be required is because it does not have a long lasting effect towards the environment and could be just a waste of time.
Most of the objects you recycle do not have a long life because it can either be overused or they can be too fragile to use over again Ecologist. Overall, my opinion is that recycling should be made mandatory for people around the world. I feel that the pros of recycling outweigh the cons, but we have to take action into some of the cons to make recycling even more safe and effective than it already is. Our world is already going through major problems with climate should recycling be mandatory essay and the trash left should recycling be mandatory essay the oceans or streets are killing animals, wildlife, and the planet.
A study found that if that people around the world where to recycle aluminum twice as much as we did today, then over a million tons of pollutants would be kept out of the atmosphere Brenner. Studies also say that if more people recycled it would reuse fifty- percent of the volume of water in landfills Brenner. In conclusion, if recycling was mandatory around the world then these numbers would be higher and the planet would be cleaner and pollution would not be a big problem anymore. Need a custom essay on the same topic?
Our writers can help you with any type of essay. For any subject Get your price How it works.
restaurant evaluation essay
On a global scale, methane emissions account for a great proportion of overall landfill emissions. Thus, as a result of the landfill gas recovery, organic material will be diverted, which will eliminate methane production. Further, the applied practices of waste accumulation and disposal in landfills cause hazardous diseases. Vast emissions of infectious gasses result in serious respiratory diseases. The toxic liquids stored in landfills further pollute water sources and spread dangerous diseases. Recycling is rather beneficial for the environment because the process assumes saving resources and lessening the pollution of the landfills, air and water.
Considering the amount of waste disposal on a global scale, recycling is not an option but a mandatory measure to save the Planet. Need A Unique Essay on "Why Should Recycling Be Mandatory? Recycling associates with energy-saving More energy conservation is achieved through the wide-scale implementation of the recycling processes. As a result, considerable amounts of energy are being saved. Compared to the products made from scratch, the recycled products do not require so much processing to make them usable again. Recycling of plastic bottles saves up to 76 per cent of energy, while recycled paper saves up to 40 percent, and recycled glass up to 30 per cent respectively Tierney, By contrast, the processes that deploy raw materials wood, oil, ore etc are energy-consuming.
Many, therefore, consider the win-win solution in recycling, the process that assumes waste conversion into the new products. Recycling assumes economic benefits Given the depletion of the energy sources and rising cost for energy, recycling is considered as a win-win option to save on production costs. Recycling presents a highly diverse and labor intensive industry Minter, The industry holds a vast potential for employment. Landfill waste management holds far lesser potential in job creation compared to recycling. On average, the disposal of 10, tons of waste in a landfill will require six workers, whereas the recycling process for the same amount of waste will employ 36 workers Ackerman, With the vaster amount of recycling initiatives and projects, more industries will follow suit and create new jobs.
Conclusion The paper has embraced the core reasons for making recycling mandatory, i. recycling lessens the need for landfills, recycling benefits energy-saving and finally recycling assumes economic advantages. Actually, he is being generous because if people compute the energy needed to ship a leftover designer water bottle to China along with millions of others to be reprocessed, manufactured into a new item, then shipped back to the U. Even one of the best examples that environmentalist use to persuade people to recycle has had problems with the environment. Recycling water bottles does not always helps the environment or saves recourses; actually, sometimes it produces more pollution due to the energy used to transport the bottles and process them.
Recycling sometimes could be even harmful than beneficial. In addition, there is another factor to consider when people think about saving resources: the scarcity. Yet there is no environmental reason to recycle trash because resources are not scarce. For example, another example that environmentalist usually use trying to persuade people to recycle is paper. They argue that if people ecycle paper sheets or newsprint, the beautiful trees that maintain our jungles and landscapes gorgeous will be saved instead of converted into newsprint; but the reality is that those arguments are false. In fact, much newsprint comes from trees grown for that specific purpose Bandow, Considering this factor, when people recycle paper they are not saving our beautiful landscapes, they are just saving trees that were planted for that specific purpose and also saving the money of the big companies that need to plant trees in order to produce paper to sell.
Another reason of why recycling should not be mandatory is because garbage is not harmful for people and recycling not always protects ecosystems. People should know one extremely important thing; folks recycle because they think it is a good thing to do, but what is the real point of being a green person? The truth is that garbage will not damage the society and recycling is not the miraculous method that will save the ecosystems in the earth. As time goes by through the past of the years, garbage accumulates, but also disappears thanks to they new technologies created in order to have a solution for garbage problems.
The arguments that establish that our garbage will bury us and that it will also poison us are completely false. According to Daniel K. Benjamin , since the s, people repeatedly have claimed that the United States faces a landfill crisis. The United States today has more landfill capacity than ever before. In , the nation's landfills could accommodate 18 years' worth of rubbish, an amount 25 percent greater than a decade before. Nowadays is pretty clear that we are not going to be full of garbage in the future. The myths that stated that in a few years there would be no more landfill spaces for garbage in the United States were completely false, but the good new is that nowadays the mentioned misconception is completely denied. In addition, there were many people who argued that the garbage sent to landfills could produce deaths in the country.
They think that the toxic substances produces by the garbage could reach cities and cause dangerous diseases to people. Again the good new is that they were wrong. According to Benjamin , the Environmental Protection Agency itself acknowledges that the risks to humans from modern landfills are virtually nonexistent: Modern landfills can be expected to cause 5. To put this in perspective, cancer kills over , people every year in the United States. In a few words, there is technically no risk for humans to die because of the accumulation of toxic substances produced by the trash that is in landfills. In addition, it is interesting to know how garbage and not going green sometimes deal with different kind of subjects that apparently people did not have idea about before.
Recycling is a process that in a good point of views cuts pollution but that is not always. Recycling can reduce pollution but when is time to recycle things it produces almost the same pollution it prevented before. So what is it the point of recycle? The EPA has examined both virgin paper processing and recycled paper processing for toxic substances and found that toxins often are more prevalent in the recycling processes Benjamin, People should know that in occasions recycling produces more pollution than the ones that it is supposed to save.
If people think that recycling is supposed to save the environment, how can it cause more pollution than the normal garbage process? The answer again is misconceptions. Finally, recycling needs more money than people think. When we hear recycling, one of the first words that come to our mind right away is save; save money, save resources, save the world. All this since there is too many people who assume that recycling is a right thing to do. Experts have been doing research about recycling and its expenses, is it really worth to invest those big amounts of money in just going green? We all would like to have a yes answer to that question; unfortunately we obtain a different answer, an opposing one. The reality is that collecting recyclable items is more expensive than collecting just garbage to landfills.
All of this because when people want to recycle they have to separate all stuff depending on how is it classified. It takes a lot of time to classify, but also transport to go back and forward for each thing. Instead if people collect all the garbage at once, they would save time and money, but also carbon dioxide would be less produced by the trucks used to pick up the garbage. It is unbelievable the amount of money that is invested on recycling. All green products are more expensive than products that are not recycled, and that is because it costs too much to recycle. Another important fact is that recycling programs usually operate in a deficit. This is a great problem. How does recycling is supposed to be mandatory if recycling programs usually operate in a deficit?
It is very difficult for local government to maintain these recycling programs because sometimes the local budget is limited and waste money in a program that operates in a deficit is a very bad idea. The government of that city has already the experience needed to know the truth about recycling programs and the only cause that they produce: waste of money. Recycling seems to be useful just for people who still believe all the myths about it and have not yet discovered the truth about this method. Nowadays, recycling should not be mandatory because it is very expensive, and in the big majority of the occasions the recycling programs operate in a deficit that produces financial problems in local governments. In addition, the myth about landfill spaces is completely false because nowadays there are a lot of landfills with great technology that eliminates the risk of poison people because of the garbage.
Finally, it is proved that recycling does not always save resources and in some cases, it wastes more energy or water than the normal garbage process. The question now is: how can such a wasteful practice persist? Environmentalists may enuinely believe they're helping the Earth, but they have been hurting the common good while profiting personally". Tierney provide a great response for such a controversial question. The politicians who feel pressure by environmentalists are the ones who still support recycling in order to maintain their good political status. On the other hand, environmentalist may think that they are really helping the health of the world, but something that is really truth is that they are being directly beneficiated because of the continuity of recycling.
Do they really want to go green or do they prefer to go for the green material named dollars? The real intention of environmentalists is something that only they know. People may feel confortable with recycling because they could think that they are helping; and if they feel good about themselves they are free to continue with this wasteful practice, but the government should reveal the truth about recycling in order to clarify the misconceptions about this topic. If after that people still want to recycle they are still free to do so. After people know the real pros and cons about recycling it would be very easy for the majority to know if recycling should be mandatory or not.
on Should Recycling Be Mandatory? The process of recycling helps us reduce carbon emissions also known as greenhouse gasses. Conserve natural resources. Strengthens property value. Saves energy. Minimizes waste accumulation. Technological advancement acceleration. Saves you money. Conserves wildlife. Clean cities. Offers a sustainable future. While some might say recycling wastes resources, recycling should be made mandatory because recycling helps the planet by saving expenses, helping preserve our natural resources, and recycling helps minimize pollution. If people do not want to recycle then they do not want to save the energy in the planet. Mandatory Recycling Laws: Pros and Cons Mandatory Recycling Laws: Pros and Cons.
No comments:
Post a Comment